<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Things are Worth Waiting For</title>
	<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/03/good-things-are-worth-waiting-for/</link>
	<description>Intermittent broadcasts from Oshoma Momoh</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry King</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/03/good-things-are-worth-waiting-for/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 14:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/03/good-things-are-worth-waiting-for/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Osh, interesting piece on Gladwell’s observations and thanks for providing the video stream.  I really like Gladwell because I see in him that rare ability to discern interesting and often controversial phenomena from the most commonplace of events or things. If Tom Friedman is right and we're heading towards a world where value is increasingly going to be created horizontally--by how we connect and collaborate across departments and companies--that skill will be important.  Like Leonardo da Vinci, Gladwell embodies "Saper Vedere", the ability to know how to see, and his writings are a warning against intellectual laziness and groupthink. 

While I recognize his strength as an agent provocateur, one particularly skilled at providing a clever turn of phrase, I have to admit that I find it challenging as a practitioner to make use of his insights. Gladwell’s observations can be a challenge to operationalize. Take, for example,  the idea of practicing patience while waiting for creative fruit to bear . As he himself responds during the Q &#38; A session, one ideally wants to end up with a portfolio: be it of talent, rock bands, start-up companies, stock investments, etc. combining near-, mid- and long term projects and payoffs.  In reality however, I believe we mostly hope for near term projects and payoffs and grudgingly accept the outcome that some will inevitably bleed into mid- and long-term payoffs.  However, we rarely overtly set out to embrace long-term payoffs because of the difficulty in being able to differentiate long term hopefuls from long term failures. That differentiation is key and I feel no closer to knowing how to do it better post viewing this Gladwell video than I was before.

For more on your call for patience “And good things - some of which may take a long, long time to develop - are worth waiting for.”, see Samuelson, Judith and Preisser, Claire, A Critical Mass For the Long Term, in “Breakthrough Ideas for 2006,” Harvard Business Review, February 2006, pg. 62.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osh, interesting piece on Gladwell’s observations and thanks for providing the video stream.  I really like Gladwell because I see in him that rare ability to discern interesting and often controversial phenomena from the most commonplace of events or things. If Tom Friedman is right and we&#8217;re heading towards a world where value is increasingly going to be created horizontally&#8211;by how we connect and collaborate across departments and companies&#8211;that skill will be important.  Like Leonardo da Vinci, Gladwell embodies &#8220;Saper Vedere&#8221;, the ability to know how to see, and his writings are a warning against intellectual laziness and groupthink. </p>
<p>While I recognize his strength as an agent provocateur, one particularly skilled at providing a clever turn of phrase, I have to admit that I find it challenging as a practitioner to make use of his insights. Gladwell’s observations can be a challenge to operationalize. Take, for example,  the idea of practicing patience while waiting for creative fruit to bear . As he himself responds during the Q &amp; A session, one ideally wants to end up with a portfolio: be it of talent, rock bands, start-up companies, stock investments, etc. combining near-, mid- and long term projects and payoffs.  In reality however, I believe we mostly hope for near term projects and payoffs and grudgingly accept the outcome that some will inevitably bleed into mid- and long-term payoffs.  However, we rarely overtly set out to embrace long-term payoffs because of the difficulty in being able to differentiate long term hopefuls from long term failures. That differentiation is key and I feel no closer to knowing how to do it better post viewing this Gladwell video than I was before.</p>
<p>For more on your call for patience “And good things - some of which may take a long, long time to develop - are worth waiting for.”, see Samuelson, Judith and Preisser, Claire, A Critical Mass For the Long Term, in “Breakthrough Ideas for 2006,” Harvard Business Review, February 2006, pg. 62.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Own Pirate Radio &#187; Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s Rotman talk available online</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/03/good-things-are-worth-waiting-for/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>My Own Pirate Radio &#187; Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s Rotman talk available online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/03/good-things-are-worth-waiting-for/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>[...] There is now a video availalable of the talk Malcolm Gladwell presented at Rotman earlier this week. I blogged about the talk here. Other Rotman talks including one by Jack Welch are here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There is now a video availalable of the talk Malcolm Gladwell presented at Rotman earlier this week. I blogged about the talk here. Other Rotman talks including one by Jack Welch are here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
