<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IP Squatting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/</link>
	<description>Oshoma Momoh's personal blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dog the Bounty Hunter</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog the Bounty Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Ireit got funding from starbucks moguls teehee
then they run out and buy names from netster
popular enterprises llc is the parent company of netster
popular enterprises is selling typos such as
starbuckscoffe.com on their domainmarketplace.com along with typos of microsoft, disney, dell and many other major corps
search for yourself!
why doesn't starbucks finance ireit to buy starbucks
ireit is a joke and they made fools of maveron and perot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ireit got funding from starbucks moguls teehee<br />
then they run out and buy names from netster<br />
popular enterprises llc is the parent company of netster<br />
popular enterprises is selling typos such as<br />
starbuckscoffe.com on their domainmarketplace.com along with typos of microsoft, disney, dell and many other major corps<br />
search for yourself!<br />
why doesn&#8217;t starbucks finance ireit to buy starbucks<br />
ireit is a joke and they made fools of maveron and perot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oshoma Momoh</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Oshoma Momoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Yeah that is probably not implementable. I suppose you could implement price-capping on sales of domain names, but I find that even less palatable. I like your ideas although for businesses a cap on number of domains is tough to swallow. Thanks for the comment Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that is probably not implementable. I suppose you could implement price-capping on sales of domain names, but I find that even less palatable. I like your ideas although for businesses a cap on number of domains is tough to swallow. Thanks for the comment Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Dalton</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I hate domain squatting too, but I wonder how you'd enforce a policy that required people to 'do something useful' with a domain.

I wonder if an approach like the FCC uses with radio stations might work -- limit the number of domains any single person can own. And really crack down on fake registrations, with verification emails and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate domain squatting too, but I wonder how you&#8217;d enforce a policy that required people to &#8216;do something useful&#8217; with a domain.</p>
<p>I wonder if an approach like the FCC uses with radio stations might work &#8212; limit the number of domains any single person can own. And really crack down on fake registrations, with verification emails and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Own Pirate Radio &#187; Sticks and stones may break my bones</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>My Own Pirate Radio &#187; Sticks and stones may break my bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] On the other hand, one has to wonder how much of their revenue will come from suing infringers rather than selling patent licenses to wannabe implementors. Infringement lawsuits are bound to happen, whether IV seeks them out our not. Are we to believe Intellectual Ventures is benevolent, a &#8220;patent angel&#8221; even, provided they don&#8217;t proactively seek to lodge lawsuits? The proactive element seems to be a key defining characteristic of trolls. Or is squatting on IP just inherently bad, and something we should dissuade in all cases? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the other hand, one has to wonder how much of their revenue will come from suing infringers rather than selling patent licenses to wannabe implementors. Infringement lawsuits are bound to happen, whether IV seeks them out our not. Are we to believe Intellectual Ventures is benevolent, a &#8220;patent angel&#8221; even, provided they don&#8217;t proactively seek to lodge lawsuits? The proactive element seems to be a key defining characteristic of trolls. Or is squatting on IP just inherently bad, and something we should dissuade in all cases? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Own Pirate Radio &#187; More on IP</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>My Own Pirate Radio &#187; More on IP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myownpirateradio.com/2006/04/17/ip-squatting/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>[...] While we&#8217;re on the topic of IP, Paul Graham has an essay worth reading entitled &#8220;Are Software Patents Evil?&#8221;. Thanks Mike for the link and summary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While we&#8217;re on the topic of IP, Paul Graham has an essay worth reading entitled &#8220;Are Software Patents Evil?&#8221;. Thanks Mike for the link and summary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
