<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next-Gen Web Hosting</title>
	<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2007/11/16/next-gen-web-hosting/</link>
	<description>Intermittent broadcasts from Oshoma Momoh</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: My Own Pirate Radio &#187; Utility Computing in Forbes</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2007/11/16/next-gen-web-hosting/#comment-23113</link>
		<dc:creator>My Own Pirate Radio &#187; Utility Computing in Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myownpirateradio.com/2007/11/16/next-gen-web-hosting/#comment-23113</guid>
		<description>[...] buddy Al, who works at Amazon, posted an interesting comment on my recent next-gen web hosting post. In it he mentions this Forbes article, The Death of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] buddy Al, who works at Amazon, posted an interesting comment on my recent next-gen web hosting post. In it he mentions this Forbes article, The Death of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://myownpirateradio.com/2007/11/16/next-gen-web-hosting/#comment-23099</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myownpirateradio.com/2007/11/16/next-gen-web-hosting/#comment-23099</guid>
		<description>Forbes ran an interesting article on this yesterday. 

http://www.forbes.com/technology/forbes/2008/0211/036.html

thought you might be interested in some of the size estimates they had in there. The thing that surprises me most about EC2 is that there aren't more players already well established in this arena. Forbes alludes to Sun,. IBM and EMC. Is Amazon really the best option today? Another interesting claim in this article is that renting computing via EC2 is up to 90% cheaper that Equinix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forbes ran an interesting article on this yesterday. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/technology/forbes/2008/0211/036.html" rel="nofollow" onClick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.forbes.com');">http://www.forbes.com/technology/forbes/2008/0211/036.html</a></p>
<p>thought you might be interested in some of the size estimates they had in there. The thing that surprises me most about EC2 is that there aren&#8217;t more players already well established in this arena. Forbes alludes to Sun,. IBM and EMC. Is Amazon really the best option today? Another interesting claim in this article is that renting computing via EC2 is up to 90% cheaper that Equinix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
